首页> 外文OA文献 >Seroprevalences to viral pathogens in free-ranging and captive cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) on Namibian farmland
【2h】

Seroprevalences to viral pathogens in free-ranging and captive cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) on Namibian farmland

机译:纳米比亚农田自由放养和圈养的猎豹(Acinonyx jubatus)对病毒病原体的血清阳性率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cheetah populations are diminishing rapidly in their natural habitat. One reason for their decline is thought to be a high susceptibility to (infectious) diseases because cheetahs in zoos suffer from high disease-induced mortality. Data on the health status of free-ranging cheetahs are scarce and little is known about their exposure and susceptibility to infectious diseases. We determined seroprevalence to nine key viruses (feline herpesvirus 1, feline calicivirus, feline parvovirus, feline corona virus, canine distemper virus, feline immunodeficiency virus, puma lentivirus, feline leukemia virus and rabies virus) in 68 free-ranging cheetahs on east-central Namibian farmland, 24 non-vaccinated Namibian captive cheetahs and several other wild carnivore species, and conducted necropsies of cheetahs and other wild carnivores. Eight of eleven other wild carnivores were sero-positive for at least one of the viruses, including the first record of an FIV-like infection in a wild felid west of the Kalahari, the caracal (Felis caracal). Seroprevalences of the free-ranging cheetahs were below 5% for all nine viruses, significantly lower than seroprevalences in non-vaccinated captive cheetahs and for five of seven viruses in free-ranging cheetahs from north-central Namibia previously studied (1). There was no clinical or pathological evidence for infectious diseases in living or dead cheetahs. The results suggest that - whilst free-ranging wild carnivores may be a source of pathogens -, the distribution of seroprevalences across studies mirrored local human population density and factors associated with human habitation, probably reflecting contact opportunities with (non-vaccinated) domestic and feral cats and dogs. They also suggest that Namibian cheetahs respond effectively to viral challenges, encouraging consistent and sustainable conservation efforts. 1. Munson, L., L. Marker, E. Dubovi, J. A. Spencer, J. F. Evermann, and S. J. O'Brien. 2004. J. Wildl. Dis. 40:23-31.
机译:猎豹的自然栖息地正在迅速减少。人们认为它们下降的原因之一是对(传染性)疾病的高度易感性,因为动物园中的猎豹遭受的疾病致死率很高。关于自由放养的猎豹的健康状况的数据很少,关于它们的暴露程度和对传染病的易感性知之甚少。我们在东部中部的68头自由猎豹中确定了对9种主要病毒(猫疱疹病毒1,猫杯状病毒,猫细小病毒,猫冠状病毒,犬瘟热病毒,猫免疫缺陷病毒,美洲狮慢病毒,猫白血病病毒和狂犬病病毒)的血清阳性率纳米比亚的农田,24种未接种疫苗的纳米比亚圈养的猎豹和其他几种野生食肉动物,并对这些猎豹和其他野生食肉动物进行了尸检。其他11种野生食肉动物中的8种对至少一种病毒呈血清阳性,包括在卡拉卡拉(卡拉卡尔)(Felis caracal)西部的野生猫科动物中首次记录到FIV样感染。对于所有九种病毒,自由放养的猎豹的血清阳性率均低于5%,远低于未接种的圈养猎豹和来自纳米比亚中北部的自由放养的猎豹的七种病毒中的五种的血清流行率(1)。没有活体或死豹的传染病的临床或病理学证据。结果表明-尽管自由放养的食肉动物可能是病原体的源头-但整个研究的血清阳性率分布反映了当地人口密度和与人类居住相关的因素,可能反映了与(未接种疫苗的)家养和野性接触的机会猫和狗。他们还建议,纳米比亚的猎豹对病毒的挑战做出有效反应,鼓励持续而可持续的保护工作。 1. L. Munson,L。Marker,E。Dubovi,J。A. Spencer,J。F. Evermann和S. J. O'Brien。 2004.J.怀尔德。 Dis。 40:23-31。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号